Article 2018

Adapting the graduation efficiency index to provide a consistent basis for assessment of student progress towards graduation

Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education
Journal · Vol. 22 · Issue 4 · pp. 124-133
Abstract

Graduation efficiency is of top concern for institutions of higher education throughout the world. Increasingly, accountability metrics have come under scrutiny as policymakers seek to ensure public resources are efficiently used. Traditionally, higher education policymakers in the USA and Europe have used graduation rate as an accountability measure to assess a university’s efficient use of resources. This time-to-degree method, however, does not take into account the shift in student demographics from a traditional full-time student to the diverse group of students pursuing higher education through varied paths, including balancing work with reduced course loads, studying abroad, completing internships, among others. These changes suggest additional accountability measures are needed to accurately capture student progress as it relates to resource utilisation. This research adapts the Graduation Efficiency Index proposed by Gillmore and Hoffman (1997) to a cohort-based model to allow for evaluating retention policies implemented by cohorts to improve student progress. © 2018, © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Higher education Gender policy retention Age race Graduation efficiency

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Management Information Systems, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
Evaluation and Planning, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, United States
Technology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
University of North Carolina, UNC
The authors wish to express their appreciation to the support provided by the initial research team at the University of North Carolina, General Administration, Dr James Sadler, Dr Xiaoyun Yang, and Mr Keith Brown.
References 10 References
1 Chronicle of Higher Education, (2025)
2 Study Abroad in A New Global Century Renewing the Promise Refining the Purpose, (2012)
3 Alexander, F. King, The changing face of accountability: Monitoring and assessing institutional performance in higher education, Journal of Higher Education, 71, 4, pp. 411-431, (2000)
4 Higher Education Learning Outcomes Assessment International Perspectives, (2014)
5 Cochran, Justin Daniel, The Role of Student Characteristics in Predicting Retention in Online Courses, Research in Higher Education, 55, 1, pp. 27-48, (2014)
6 Change, (2008)
7 Improving Student Transfer from Community Colleges to Four Year Institutions the Perspective of Leaders from Baccalaureate Granting Institutions, (2011)
8 Cranmer, Sue, Enhancing graduate employability: Best intentions and mixed outcomes, Studies in Higher Education, 31, 2, pp. 169-184, (2006)
9 Davey, Anne, Enhancing higher education students' employability and career management: A library service approach, Library Review, 59, 6, pp. 445-454, (2010)
10 Díaz-Strong, Daysi Ximena, Purged: Undocumented Students, Financial Aid polices, and Access to Higher Education, Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 10, 2, pp. 107-119, (2011)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
1
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers