Review 2017

Beyond "common Sense": The Role of Local Knowledge in Youth Residential Treatment

Social Work Research
Journal · Vol. 41 · Issue 4 · pp. 221-233
Abstract

Social work scholars have challenged the reliance on so-called "common sense" to guide clinical practice. This article reports findings from an ethnographic study of knowledge use and decision making in a residential treatment center (RTC) for children. Specifically, it asks what knowledge informs the everyday practice of mental health workers and analyzes participants' assertions that expert practice requires the possession of what they refer to as "common sense." Approximately 1,560 hours of participant observation and 36 semistructured interviews were conducted with 78 consenting mental health workers at the participating RTC. Participants reported that they valued and relied on common sense in their everyday practice and emphasized it in assessments of others' expertise. They described common sense as a natural quality of individuals, not learnable through professional education or on-the-job training. These assertions that practice expertise requires common sense obscure a rich body of local knowledge that workers drew on in practice. Common sense is more accurately understood as site-specific local knowledge calibrated to the unique demands of the organization. Further study of the character and transmission of local knowledge may inform social work research, education, and practice with implications for models of clinical decision making and knowledge transfer within and between organizations. © 2017 National Association of Social Workers.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Expertise Ethnography evidence-based practice Local knowledge residential treatment

Index Keywords

female human male juvenile Vocational education clinical practice human experiment semi structured interview social work organization child ethnography clinical decision making mental health service assertiveness residential care
Author Affiliations
School of Social Work, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Social Service Review, (1983)
2 Research Methods in Anthropology Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, (1995)
3 Carr, E. Summerson, Qualifying the qualitative social work interview, Qualitative Social Work, 10, 1, pp. 123-143, (2011)
4 Chu, William C.K., The nature of practice wisdom in social work revisited, International Social Work, 51, 1, pp. 47-54, (2008)
5 Shadowing and Other Techniques for Doing Fieldwork in Modern Societies, (2007)
6 Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections, (1915)
7 Floersch, Jerry E., A Method for Investigating Practitioner Use of Theory in Practice, Qualitative Social Work, 3, 2, pp. 161-177, (2004)
8 Fook, Jan, Towards a theory of social work expertise, British Journal of Social Work, 27, 3, pp. 399-417, (1997)
9 Gambrill, Eileen D., Evidence-based practice: An alternative to authority-based practice, Families in Society, 80, 4, pp. 341-350, (1999)
10 Antioch Review, (1975)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
5
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers