Article 2016

Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K–12 levels: a systematic review

Studies in Science Education
Journal · Vol. 52 · Issue 2 · pp. 199-231
Abstract

Project-based teaching is nothing new; it originates from the work of authors like Dewey and Kilpatrick. Recent decades have seen renewed interest in this approach. In many countries, it is currently considered to be an innovative approach to science and technology (S&T) teaching. In this article, we present a systematic review of what recent scientific publications teach us about this approach: How is this approach identified in these publications? How is the use of this approach in school S&T justified? What are the main research questions covered by studies in the field? What do these studies on this approach teach us? To answer these questions, we have selected and analysed articles published, between 2000 and 2014, in journals that are specialised in school science and technology education and that are indexed in ERIC database. In the synthesis based on this analysis, we present: (a) the theoretical constructs used by the authors to refer to this approach and the features identified to define it; (b) the justifications for this approach; (c) the research questions covered by studies in the field; (d) the data collection and analysis methods used in these studies; and (e) the main findings. In addition to presenting a synthesis of current research in this field, we offer a critical discussion thereof with a focus on two aspects, namely the way PBSTL is conceptualised and the rigour of the research methods used to ensure the validity of findings. © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Project-Based Learning Systematic review science education Technology Education project-based teaching

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Faculté d’éducation, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Ainley, Mary D., A cultural perspective on the structure of student interest in science, International Journal of Science Education, 33, 1, pp. 51-71, (2011)
2 Ainley, Mary D., Students, tasks and emotions: Identifying the contribution of emotions to students' reading of popular culture and popular science texts, Learning and Instruction, 15, 5, pp. 433-447, (2005)
3 Ainley, Mary D., Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship, Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 3, pp. 545-561, (2002)
4 Anderson, Ronald D., Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 1, pp. 1-12, (2002)
5 Barak, Moshe, Learning good electronics or coping with challenging tasks: The priorities of excellent students, Journal of Technology Education, 14, 1, pp. 20-34, (2002)
6 Barak, Moshe, Issues involved in attempting to develop independent learning in pupils working on technological projects, International Journal of Phytoremediation, 22, 2, pp. 171-183, (2004)
7 Barak, Moshe, Projects in technology education and fostering learning: The potential and its realization, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 3, pp. 285-296, (2008)
8 Lanalyse De Contenu, (2013)
9 Bartos, Stephen A., Teachers' knowledge structures for nature of science and scientific inquiry: Conceptions and classroom practice, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 9, pp. 1150-1184, (2014)
10 Research Evidence in Education Library, (2005)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
93
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers