Article 2016

Validating Kohler's Taxonomy of Transition Programming for adolescents with intellectual disability in the Chinese context

Research in Developmental Disabilities
Journal · Vol. 48 · pp. 242-252
Abstract

Background: School-to-work transition programmes play a crucial role in the achievement of post-secondary outcomes for young adults with intellectual disability (ID). Although special education in China has progressed in the last two decades, systematically planned transition education and services are not usually available for Chinese school leavers. Aims: The present study aimed to validate Kohler's Taxonomy of Transition Programming (KTTP) in the Chinese context for adolescents with ID. Methods and procedures: Five Chinese transition experts reviewed KTTP items, 14 Chinese transition teachers and 14 parents of adolescents with ID who would transition from school in the next 12 months were interviewed, and 329 transition teachers were surveyed. Outcome and results: Most items in KTTP were found to be important and relevant to the Chinese context. Based on KTTP, a modified transition framework appropriate to the Chinese context was generated. Conclusions and implications: The Chinese transition framework may assist parents and professionals to better support adolescents with ID in China. Future validation checks of the framework will add confidence that the framework captures the essential components of effective transition practices appropriate in the Chinese context. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords

Author Keywords

School-to-work transition China intellectual disability Kohler's Taxonomy of Transition Programming

Index Keywords

adult China female human male procedures psychology questionnaire Humans adolescent Article educational status young adult Vocational education reliability controlled study practice guideline intellectual impairment Chinese internal consistency middle aged major clinical study program evaluation school Schools Social support organization and management taxonomy validation study education program Cronbach alpha coefficient working time content validity Exploratory research supported employment Employment, Supported Intellectual Disability special education social adaptation Social Adjustment education of intellectually disabled nonbiological model Models, Organizational factorial analysis Kohler Taxonomy for Transition Programming school to work transition programme life event Life Change Events
Author Affiliations
School of Education, The University of Newcastle, Australia, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Anderson, Douglas, What's Happening in Personnel Preparation in Transition? A National Survey, Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 2, pp. 145-160, (2003)
2 Beamish, Wendi, Benchmarking teacher practice in queensland transition programs for youth with intellectual disability and autism, Journal of Special Education, 45, 4, pp. 227-241, (2012)
3 Beavers, Amy S., Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research, Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 18, 6, pp. 1-13, (2013)
4 Benz, Michael R., Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives, Exceptional Children, 66, 4, pp. 509-529, (2000)
5 Blalock, Ginger, Introduction to the Special Issue on Personnel Preparation in Transition, Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 26, 2, pp. 125-129, (2003)
6 Transforming Qualitative Information Thematic Analysis and Code Development, (1998)
7 Transition from School to Work for Persons with Disabilities, (1989)
8 Brooks-Lane, Nancy, Supporting consumer directed employment outcomes, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 23, 2, pp. 123-134, (2005)
9 Total Number of Population with Disabilities in China by the End of 2010, (2012)
10 Costello, Anna B., Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis, Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10, 7, (2005)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
6
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers