Book chapter Green Open Access 2015

Developing Students’ Personal Epistemologies

Professional and Practice-based Learning
Journal · Vol. 13 · pp. 225-251
Abstract

Students’ personal epistemologies are central to their learning in both education and practice settings. These epistemologies comprise what they know, can do and value and as such are the foundations for how they engage with what they experience in both settings, and also come to learn from those activities and interactions. A helpful concept to understand about developing further learners’ personal epistemologies is to consider their readiness to learn, in terms of their conceptual, procedural and dispositional capacities to engage with and learn from what they experience. That is, if students do not have the kinds of capacities required to effectively engage in practice, they may not be able to make the kinds of transitions to be able to learn effectively for what is required both during their course and then after their graduation. The point is that different kinds of experience will generate different kinds of learning, and the students’ level of readiness can be a predictor of the ways in which students can engage and, therefore, learn through their activities, albeit in the educational institution or workplace. This readiness places the students in zones of potential development, as Vygotsky proposes. Hence, quite contrary to the popular concept of the Zone of Proximal Development, it is as much the extent of the learners’ ability to extend what they know, can do and value through their own efforts as when assisted by others. It is these issues that are considered in this chapter in terms of personal epistemologies, learner readiness and the promotion of individuals’ personal epistemologies through teacherly actions. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Personal Epistemology Pedagogic Practice Practice Setting Workplace Setting Epistemological Belief

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
School of Education, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Anderson, John Robert, Acquisition of cognitive skill, Psychological Review, 89, 4, pp. 369-406, (1982)
2 Baldwin, J. Mark, Personality-suggestion, Psychological Review, 1, 3, pp. 274-279, (1894)
3 Baldwin, J. Mark, On selective thinking, Psychological Review, 5, 1, pp. 1-24, (1898)
4 Women S Ways of Knowing the Development of Self Voice and Mind, (1986)
5 Billett, Stephen Richard, Sociogeneses, activity and ontogeny, Culture and Psychology, 9, 2, pp. 133-169, (2003)
6 Developing Agentic Professionals Through Practice Based Pedagogies, (2009)
7 Billett, Stephen Richard, Personal epistemologies, work and learning, Educational Research Review, 4, 3, pp. 210-219, (2009)
8 Curriculum and Pedagogic Bases for Effectively Integrating Practice Based Experiences, (2011)
9 Billett, Stephen Richard, Integrating learning experiences across tertiary education and practice settings: A socio-personal account, Educational Research Review, 12, pp. 1-13, (2014)
10 Billett, Stephen Richard, Understanding work, learning and the remaking of cultural practices, Studies in Continuing Education, 27, 3, pp. 219-237, (2005)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers