Article Green Open Access 2014

Factors Within University-Based Teacher Education Relating to Preservice Teachers’ Professional Vision

Vocations and Learning
Journal · Vol. 8 · Issue 1 · pp. 35-54
Abstract

Preservice teachers’ professional vision is an important indicator of their initial acquisition of integrated knowledge structures within university-based teacher education. To date, empirical research investigating which factors contribute to explaining preservice teachers’ professional vision is scarce. This study aims to determine which factors are related to preservice teachers’ incipient professional vision and may constitute necessary conditions for development processes. The participants were 55 preservice teachers who completed a questionnaire investigating their individual characteristics and opportunities used for learning and a video-based tool assessing their professional vision regarding generic pedagogical knowledge of teaching and learning. We conducted multiple regression analyses to identify relevant factors. The results showed that the number of attended courses on teaching and learning and the level of interest in the content are closely related to higher levels of professional vision. No relation was found with practical experience. It is concluded that professional vision is related to conditions of content-specific knowledge acquisition, as provided in formal teacher education programs. © 2014, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Professional vision Teacher Education Teacher expertise Formal and Informal Learning

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Technische Universität München, Munich, Bayern, Germany
Department of Educational Development and Research, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Funding & Acknowledgements
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG
The Observe project (SE 1397/2-2) is funded by the German Research Foundation as part of the priority research program, “Competence Models for Assessing Individual Learning Outcomes and Evaluating Educational Processes.” We would like to thank the preservice teachers who participated in this study.
References 10 References
1 Bauer, Johannes, European teacher training reforms, Science, 336, 6089, pp. 1642-1643, (2012)
2 Baumert, Jürgen, Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress, American Educational Research Journal, 47, 1, pp. 133-180, (2010)
3 American Educational Research Journal, (1984)
4 Berk, Dawn, Improving the mathematics preparation of elementary teachers, one lesson at a time, Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15, 3, pp. 337-356, (2009)
5 Journal of Classroom Interaction, (1991)
6 Berliner, David C., Learning about and learning from expert teachers, International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 5, pp. 463-482, (2001)
7 Berliner, David C., Implications of Research on Pedagogical Expertise and Experience for Mathematics Teaching, Perspectives on Research on Effective Mathematics Teaching, 1, pp. 67-95, (2026)
8 Blomberg, Geraldine, How pre-service teachers observe teaching on video: Effects of viewers' teaching subjects and the subject of the video, Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 7, pp. 1131-1140, (2011)
9 Peadogogical Knowledge at the End of Teacher Education, (2008)
10 Blömeke, Sigrid, Family background, entry selectivity and opportunities to learn: What matters in primary teacher education? An international comparison of fifteen countries, Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 1, pp. 44-55, (2012)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
52
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers