Article 2008

Preparing the twenty-first century workforce: The case of curriculum change in radiation protection education in the united states

Journal of Vocational Education and Training
Journal · Vol. 60 · Issue 4 · pp. 423-439
Abstract

The advent of the global information society and a myriad of other rapidly changing variables are presenting many new and unique challenges for the twenty-first century workforce, and perhaps the most pressing of these challenges is actually meeting the needs for qualified workers to fill the positions in emerging and growing fields. One such field is the nuclear industry. In fact, the nuclear industry is on the verge of a workforce crisis with a need for more than 57% of current radiation protection technicians (RPTs) in the United States to be replaced in the next ten years. The University of Missouri was awarded a Department of Labor grant to build an associates of applied science curriculum for the next generation of RPTs. After determining that the dominant approach to RPT training in the industry is via memorisation and recall, the question for the development team became how to best advance a vocational curriculum that provides innovative approaches to knowledge acquisition in meaningful contexts in an enterprise that has a relatively narrow view of learning. In the current article the process the curriculum development team underwent to approach this question is provided, along with the theoretical framework used to guide development of the curriculum and the resulting curricular design. The impact that this curriculum may have on higher order cognition and knowledge generalisation is discussed. Of particular note is the design and development of an ASK system, an online learning support system, to bolster the practical and theoretical aims of the curriculum. © 2008 The Vocational Aspect of Education Ltd.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Curriculum development Online learning environments Alternative pedagogies Radiation protection education

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
School of Information Science and Learning Technologies, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Aamodt, Agnar, Case-Based reasoning: Foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches, AI Communications, 7, 1, pp. 39-59, (1994)
2 Anderson, John Robert, Situated learning and education1, Educational Researcher, 25, 4, pp. 5-11, (1996)
3 Bareiss, Ray, Applying AI models to the design of exploratory hypermedia systems, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Hypertext, pp. 94-105, (1993)
4 Barnett, Susan M., When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer, Psychological Bulletin, 128, 4, pp. 612-637, (2002)
5 From Novice to Expert Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice, (1984)
6 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, (1956)
7 Bransford, John D., Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications, Review of Research in Education, 24, pp. 61-100, (1999)
8 Brewer, William F., Explanation in Scientists and Children, Minds and Machines, 8, 1, pp. 119-136, (1998)
9 Brown, John Seely, Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning, Educational Researcher, 18, 1, pp. 32-42, (1989)
10 Acts of Meaning Four Lectures on Mind and Culture, (1990)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
4
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers