Review 2024

Assessing student learning in work-integrated learning (WIL): A systematic review on assessment methods and purposes

Studies in Educational Evaluation
Journal · Vol. 81 · Art. 101345
Abstract

Under increasing pressure from quality assurance and other accountability concerns, it is easy to fall into the trap of assessing students only for the sake of assessment. This review aims to help educators rethink assessment in work-integrated learning (WIL) courses with purpose in mind by identifying the assessment methods used to assess student learning in such courses over the last 20 years, together with the underlying purposes of assessment. Based on the analysis of 103 selected articles from four databases and additional searching, 22 assessment methods and seven broad categories of assessment purposes were identified. One key finding is that the assessment of student learning in WIL courses outlined in the results was mainly implemented as assessment for learning to support students’ development as self-regulated, lifelong learners. Based on this finding, we propose three assessment design principles for self-regulated learning with recommendations on how to utilize different assessment methods to their fullest potential in preparing students for their futures. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

Author Keywords

Higher education lifelong learning work-integrated learning Assessment Self-regulated learning

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Ajjawi, Rola, Aligning assessment with the needs of work-integrated learning: the challenges of authentic assessment in a complex context, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45, 2, pp. 304-316, (2020)
2 Arsenis, Panagiotis, Confidence and gender differences within a work-integrated learning programme: evidence from a UK higher education institution, Higher Education Research and Development, 40, 5, pp. 947-963, (2021)
3 Ashford-Rowe, Kevin, Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 2, pp. 205-222, (2014)
4 Work Based Learning and Work Integrated Learning Fostering Engagement with Employers, (2016)
5 Bacon, Rachel, A Consensus Model: Shifting assessment practices in dietetics tertiary education, Nutrition and Dietetics, 75, 4, pp. 418-430, (2018)
6 Journal of Criminal Justice Education, (2003)
7 Beard, Deborah F., Assessment of internship experiences and accounting core competencies, Accounting Education, 16, 2, pp. 207-220, (2007)
8 Bearman, Margaret L., Support for assessment practice: developing the Assessment Design Decisions Framework, Teaching in Higher Education, 21, 5, pp. 545-556, (2016)
9 Bennett, Randy Elliot, Formative assessment: A critical review, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18, 1, pp. 5-25, (2011)
10 Teaching for Quality Learning at University, (1999)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
8
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers