Article Gold Open Access 2024

Career trajectories of graduates of Russian universities of natural sciences and humanities; Карьерные траектории выпускников российских вузов естественнонаучного и гуманитарного направлений подготовки

Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovania
Journal · Vol. 68 · Issue 2 · pp. 97-113
Abstract

Introduction. The process of professional development of the country is influenced by global processes: digitalization, progressive science and institutional education, the emergence of new interdisciplinary scientific fields, the development of new factors of social mobility, the emergence of new professions, etc. This influence can be taken into account in the discrepancy between the desired labor and educational career paths with the fact that university graduates use life guidelines based on the level of dissatisfaction with their acquired profession and career. The purpose of the article is to demonstrate the distinctive features of the formation of career trajectories of university graduates who received education in the natural sciences and humanities. Materials and methods. To achieve this goal, an online questionnaire was conducted, in which 252 graduates of different years from 32 Russian universities of natural sciences and humanities took part. To process the data, sequential analysis of t-Student criteria (p = 0.05), factor analysis, and content analysis were used. Results. Special features of the formation of career trajectories have been identified: the assessment of the demand for knowledge and skills in the labor market among graduates of natural science faculties after a bachelor's degree is higher than among graduates of humanities (7.17 compared to 5.75); More often than not, graduates of natural science faculties (71.6 compared to 43.1) plan to work/continue to work in the specialty acquired as a bachelor’s degree; 67.9% of graduates of natural science faculties have a longer planning horizon (several years) (compared to 43.1). from 32.1%); 26% of “techies” continue their work dynasty (compared with 6%); %); significant values for graduates of humanities are “harmony of personal life and career” (4.49 on average 4.01), “social recognition” (3.42 on average 2.95) and “emotional health” (4.52 on average 4.11), while for “techies” the opportunity to realize their entrepreneurial abilities is more significant (3.2 on average 2.75). “Humanitarians” compared to “technical specialists” are potentially more ready for sabbatical (3.46 on average 2.78), downshifting (2.65 on average 2.18) and relocation (3.40 on average 2.73). Four types of career trajectories were identified among graduates of humanities faculties (using the rotation method – Varimax): balanced multipotential, stagnant uncertain, innovative and altruistic escapism. For graduates of natural sciences, such differentiation is not defined. Conclusion. The data obtained allow us to conclude that graduates of natural science faculties have more employment opportunities due to the compliance of university training with the requirements of employers. For graduates of humanities faculties, the career trajectory is more variable, unstable, has a fluctuating nature and is associated primarily with horizontal mobility, while for graduates of natural science faculties the career trajectory is less variable and has a greater tendency toward upward mobility. © 2024 LLC Ecological Help. All rights reserved.

Keywords

Author Keywords

university graduates career trajectories humanities natural sciences

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Department of Modern Sociology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russian Federation
RCM LLC (Russian Non-Ferrous Metals), Moscow, Russian Federation
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Education 2030 Achieving Universal Inclusive and Equitable Quality Education and Lifelong Learning
2 Youth Construction of Work Biography, (2018)
3 Cherednichenko, Galina Anatolievna, Employment and labor market outcomes of college and vocational school graduates, Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, 1, pp. 256-282, (2020)
4 Finding I Unconventional Career Changing Strategies, (2005)
5 On Approval of the List of Specialties and Areas of Training in Higher Education for Undergraduate Programs Specialty Programs Master S Programs Residency Programs and Assistantship Internship Programs
6 Theoretical Issues of Pedagogy, (2010)
7 Shmeleva, Evgeniia D., Factors of Attrition among Computer Science and Engineering Undergraduates in Russia, Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, 3, pp. 56-74, (2020)
8 Kliucharev, Grigory Arturovich, On the training of engineers for high-tech industries (Employers’ view), Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2020, 3, pp. 51-59, (2020)
9 Empirical Res Voc Ed Train, (2022)
10 Russian Ministry of Education and Science Summed Up the Distribution of Budget Places to Universities and Scientific Organizations for the 2023 2024 Academic Year
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers