Conference paper 2024

What did we say in a blended lesson study among expert, in-service and preservice teachers? Exploring the collaborative talk pattern

Proceedings - 2024 International Symposium on Educational Technology, ISET 2024
Conference · pp. 300-304
Abstract

As a form of teacher collaboration, lesson study has recently received increasing attention in teacher education. Existing research highlighted the importance of two types of collaboration: one between experts and in-service teachers, and the other between preservice and in-service teachers in a blended lesson study. However, limited research has been conducted on the tripartite collaboration among experts, in-service teachers, and preservice teachers. Nowadays, collaborative talk is often used to explore the collaborative mechanisms within teacher collaboration. In this vein, Pedagogically Productive Talk (PPT) has been employed as a theoretical framework to capture its patterns. This study explored the characteristics of collaborative talk among expert, in-service, and preservice teachers in a blended lesson study through the lens of the PPT framework, employing Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) as the method of data analysis. This study particularly focused on two scenarios involving different types of experts: one being an academic expert and the other being a teaching expert with extensive teaching experience. Quantitative analysis reveals different patterns of collaborative talk between the two groups, and this study also provided insight that the inclusion of the preservice teacher contributes to the effective conduct of the collaboration mentioned above. © 2024 IEEE.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Lesson study Collaborative Talk Pedagogically Productive Talk

Index Keywords

Teaching Teachers' Collaborative learning Theoretical framework Teacher education Through the lens Preservice teachers Collaborative talk Lesson studies Methods of data analysis Pedagogically productive talk Teaching experience
Author Affiliations
Faculty of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Chokshi, Sonal, Challenges to Importing Japanese Lesson Study: Concerns, Misconceptions, and Nuances, Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 7, pp. 520-525, (2004)
2 Perry, Rebecca Reed, What is successful adaptation of lesson study in the US?, Journal of Educational Change, 10, 4, pp. 365-391, (2009)
3 Horn, Annemarie, Expert and non-expert at the same time: knowledge integration processes and dynamics in interdisciplinary teamwork, Sustainability Science, 18, 5, pp. 2357-2371, (2023)
4 Shal, Tarek Mustapha, Teacher leadership and virtual communities: Unpacking teacher agency and distributed leadership, Education and Information Technologies, 29, 12, pp. 15025-15042, (2024)
5 Dudley, Peter, Teacher learning in Lesson Study: What interaction-level discourse analysis revealed about how teachers utilised imagination, tacit knowledge of teaching and fresh evidence of pupils learning, to develop practice knowledge and so enhance their pupils' learning, Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, pp. 107-121, (2013)
6 Newman, Ruth Malka Charlotte, Let's talk talk: Utilising metatalk for the development of productive collaborative dialogues, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, pp. 1-12, (2017)
7 Lefstein, Adam, Relocating Research on Teacher Learning: Toward Pedagogically Productive Talk, Educational Researcher, 49, 5, pp. 360-368, (2020)
8 Saunders, William M., What's in a teacher team meeting? Testing pedagogically productive talk as a framework for teacher collaboration, Teaching and Teacher Education, 131, (2023)
9 Hickson, Helen, Critical reflection: Reflecting on learning to be reflective, Reflective Practice, 12, 6, pp. 829-839, (2011)
10 Clearing House, (2010)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
0
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers