Article Gold Open Access 2024

Explaining the training disadvantage of less-educated workers: the role of labor market allocation in international comparison

Socio-Economic Review
Journal · Vol. 22 · Issue 1 · pp. 195-222
Abstract

Less-educated workers have the lowest participation rates in job-related further training across the industrialized world, but the extent of their disadvantage varies. Using data on 28 high- and middle-income countries, we assess different explanations for less-educated workers’ training disadvantage relative to intermediate-educated workers, with a focus on the role of labor market allocation (i.e. job tasks, other job features and firm characteristics). Shapley decompositions reveal a broadly similar pattern for all countries: differences in labor market allocation between less- and intermediate-educated workers are more important for explaining the training gap than differences in individual learning disposition (i.e. cognitive skills and motivation to learn). Our analysis further suggests that the training gap is related to educational and labor market institutions and that labor market allocation processes play a key role in mediating any institutional ‘effects’. Strong conclusions regarding the role of institutions are hampered by the small country-level sample, however. © The Author(s) 2023.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Skills Education systems inequality in adult training labor market allocation labor market institutions Shapley decomposition

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Sozialforschung, Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Sozialforschung, Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, H2020
Grant: 822330
This research was funded in part by the European Commission for the project \u2018Technological inequality\u2014understanding the relation between recent technological innovations and social inequalities (TECHNEQUALITY)\u2019 (Grant Agreement number: 822330\u2014TECHNEQUALITY, H2020-SC6-TRANSFORMATIONS-2018-2019-2020/H2020-SC6-TRANSFORMATIONS-2018).
European Commission, EC
Grant: H2020-SC6-TRANSFORMATIONS-2018-2019-2020/H2020-SC6-TRANSFORMATIONS-2018
This research was funded in part by the European Commission for the project \u2018Technological inequality\u2014understanding the relation between recent technological innovations and social inequalities (TECHNEQUALITY)\u2019 (Grant Agreement number: 822330\u2014TECHNEQUALITY, H2020-SC6-TRANSFORMATIONS-2018-2019-2020/H2020-SC6-TRANSFORMATIONS-2018).
References 10 References
1 Abrassart, Aurélien, Cognitive skills matter: The employment disadvantage of low-educated workers in comparative perspective, European Sociological Review, 29, 4, pp. 707-719, (2013)
2 Acemoglu, Daron, Why do firms train? theory and evidence, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1, pp. 78-119, (1998)
3 Acemoglu, Daron, Beyond becker: Training in imperfect labour markets, Economic Journal, 109, 453, pp. 112-142, (1999)
4 Andersen, Robert, Education and occupational status in 14 countries: The role of educational institutions and labour market coordination, British Journal of Sociology, 61, 2, pp. 336-355, (2010)
5 Arthur, Winfred J., Factors that influence skill decay and retention: A quantitative review and analysis, Human Performance, 11, 1, pp. 57-101, (1998)
6 Autor, David H., Putting tasks to the test: Human capital, job tasks, and wages, Journal of Labor Economics, 31, 2 PART2, pp. S59-S96, (2013)
7 Autor, David H., The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 4, pp. 1279-1333, (2003)
8 Workplace Training in Europe, (2005)
9 Human Capital, (1964)
10 Dual Labour Markets Revisited, (2019)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
2
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers