Article Gold Open Access 2023

Similar or Different Training Cultures? German and Chinese Companies in Their Home and Host Countries

Societies
Journal · Vol. 13 · Issue 5 · Art. 116
Abstract

For internationally producing companies, training and recruiting skilled workers is particularly challenging. At various international locations, companies often encounter a “skills ecosystem” that differs to a greater or lesser extent from that of the home country. This article considers this problem and examines German companies in Germany and China and, conversely, Chinese companies in China and Germany. Specifically, it examines (1) how the training cultures of companies differ between the home country and abroad, (2) which influencing factors determine the training cultures realized in each case, and (3) what influence the respective nationally prevailing skills ecosystems specifically exert. The findings from these four perspectives document that German companies in Germany use the formal vocational training system of dual training, whereas German companies in China are strongly influenced by the local training culture of in-company learning. Moreover, Chinese companies in China also use this training, and only cooperate to a limited extent with the formal school-based vocational education and training system. These findings show that Chinese companies in Germany do not adopt the dual training system used in Germany. This article analyses these results and discusses the reasons behind them, drawing of a distinction between institutional logic and internal logic. © 2023 by the authors.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Skills ecosystem Vocational education Germany China Multinational companies training culture

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät der Universität zu Köln, Koln, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Funding & Acknowledgements
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG
Grant: FU 424/16-1, FU 424/17-1, PI 418/5-1, PI 418/7-1
This research was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG), grant numbers FU 424/16-1, FU 424/17-1, PI 418/5-1, PI 418/7-1.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG
This research was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG), grant numbers FU 424/16-1, FU 424/17-1, PI 418/5-1, PI 418/7-1.
References 10 References
1 Gessler, Michael, Educational Transfer as Transformation: A Case Study about the Emergence and Implementation of Dual Apprenticeship Structures in a German Automotive Transplant in the United States, Vocations and Learning, 10, 1, pp. 71-99, (2017)
2 International Comparisons of Vocational Education and Training for Intermediate Skills, (1991)
3 Pilz, Matthias, Initial vocational training from a company perspective: A comparison of British and German In-house training cultures, Vocations and Learning, 2, 1, pp. 57-74, (2009)
4 Vogelsang, Beke, Conditional factors for training activities in Chinese, Indian and Mexican subsidiaries of German companies, European Journal of Training and Development, 45, 4-5, pp. 419-435, (2021)
5 Comparative Vocational Education Research Enduring Challenges and New Ways Forward, (2020)
6 Innovations in Quality Apprenticeships for High Skilled Manufacturing Jobs in the United States at Bmw Siemens Volkswagen, (2014)
7 Fachkraftesicherung Deutscher Unternehmen Im Ausland Erfahrungen Bei Der Ubertragung Dualer Ausbildungselemente, (2017)
8 Pilz, Matthias, Tracing Teutonic footprints in VET around the world?: The skills development strategies of German companies in the USA, China and India, European Journal of Training and Development, 38, 8, pp. 745-763, (2014)
9 Pilz, Matthias, Training patterns of German companies in India, China, Japan and the USA: What really works?, International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 3, 2, pp. 66-86, (2016)
10 Erfolgsfaktoren Der Dualen Ausbildung Transfermoglichkeiten, (2014)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
3
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers