Article 2020

Public-private partnerships for skill development in the United States, Russia, and China

Post-Soviet Affairs
Journal · Vol. 36 · Issue 5-6 · pp. 495-514
Abstract

We compare three countries where public policy has explicitly sought to align incentives of employers and educational institutions around closing the gap between skill formation and labor market demand. In large, heterogeneous countries such as the United States, Russia and China, collaborative arrangements such apprenticeships and other forms of public-private partnerships can be constructed at the subnational level by building on direct, face-to-face ties across educational, business, government, and civic sectors. Drawing on existing literature as well as fieldwork studying a number of specific cases in the three countries, the paper develops a typology of such arrangements and proposes an explanation for the observed variation. It emphasizes the importance of two sets of factors: those that induce cooperation on the part of firms and schools, and those that influence the character of such partnerships. © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

Author Keywords

labor market China Technical and Vocational Education (TVET) United States Russia Public-private partnerships

Index Keywords

China education United States skilled labor comparative study labor market demand analysis incentive Russian Federation public-private partnership
Author Affiliations
Peking University, Beijing, China
Department of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States, Department of Political Science, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States, HSE University, Moscow, Russian Federation
Funding & Acknowledgements
Russian Science Foundation, RSF
Grant: 16-18-10425
This research was conducted with the support of a grant from the Russian Science Foundation, Project No. 16-18-10425, “Public-Private Partnerships in Vocational Education: Firm Level Evidence from Russia and China.” It forms part of a larger project conducted jointly with Israel Marques and Andrei Yakovlev of the Higher School of Economics. This research also received support from a grant from The National Social Science Fund of China, Grant No. 17BGL253, “Skill Formation and Regional Coordinated Innovation during Industry Upgrading.”
Russian Science Foundation, RSF
This research was conducted with the support of a grant from the Russian Science Foundation, Project No. 16-18-10425, “Public-Private Partnerships in Vocational Education: Firm Level Evidence from Russia and China.” It forms part of a larger project conducted jointly with Israel Marques and Andrei Yakovlev of the Higher School of Economics. This research also received support from a grant from The National Social Science Fund of China, Grant No. 17BGL253, “Skill Formation and Regional Coordinated Innovation during Industry Upgrading.”
National Research University Higher School of Economics, ВШЭ
This research was conducted with the support of a grant from the Russian Science Foundation, Project No. 16-18-10425, “Public-Private Partnerships in Vocational Education: Firm Level Evidence from Russia and China.” It forms part of a larger project conducted jointly with Israel Marques and Andrei Yakovlev of the Higher School of Economics. This research also received support from a grant from The National Social Science Fund of China, Grant No. 17BGL253, “Skill Formation and Regional Coordinated Innovation during Industry Upgrading.”
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, NPOPSS
Grant: 17BGL253
This research was conducted with the support of a grant from the Russian Science Foundation, Project No. 16-18-10425, “Public-Private Partnerships in Vocational Education: Firm Level Evidence from Russia and China.” It forms part of a larger project conducted jointly with Israel Marques and Andrei Yakovlev of the Higher School of Economics. This research also received support from a grant from The National Social Science Fund of China, Grant No. 17BGL253, “Skill Formation and Regional Coordinated Innovation during Industry Upgrading.”
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, NPOPSS
This research was conducted with the support of a grant from the Russian Science Foundation, Project No. 16-18-10425, “Public-Private Partnerships in Vocational Education: Firm Level Evidence from Russia and China.” It forms part of a larger project conducted jointly with Israel Marques and Andrei Yakovlev of the Higher School of Economics. This research also received support from a grant from The National Social Science Fund of China, Grant No. 17BGL253, “Skill Formation and Regional Coordinated Innovation during Industry Upgrading.”
References 10 References
1 Underemployment in the Early Careers of College Graduates Following the Great Recession, (2016)
2 Acemoglu, Daron, Why do firms train? theory and evidence, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1, pp. 78-119, (1998)
3 Arrow, Kenneth J., Dynamic shortages and price rises: The engineer-scientist case, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 73, 2, pp. 292-308, (1959)
4 Austin, Benjamin, Jobs for the heartland: Place-based policies in 21st-century America, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2018, Spring, pp. 151-255, (2018)
5 Blurring K 12 Boundaries Marlborough High School Partners with Higher Ed and Industry to Launch Stem Early College Program, (2018)
6 Busemeyer, Marius Raphael, The Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation, The Political Economy of Collective Skill Formation, pp. 1-392, (2012)
7 Chetty, Raj A.J., The fading American dream: Trends in absolute income mobility since 1940, Science, 356, 6336, pp. 398-406, (2017)
8 Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility Childhood Exposure Effects and County Level Estimates, (2015)
9 Chetty, Raj A.J., The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment, American Economic Review, 106, 4, pp. 855-902, (2016)
10 Chetty, Raj A.J., Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129, 4, pp. 1553-1623, (2014)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
13
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers