Article 2020

An integrated model of team resilience: exploring the roles of team sensemaking, team bricolage and task interdependence

Personnel Review
Journal · Vol. 49 · Issue 9 · pp. 2007-2033
Abstract

Purpose: The contemporary organizational environment calls for work team members to be more resilient in the face of likely setbacks, which are routinely experienced at the workplace. In two separate studies of work teams, we examine the impact of team sensemaking on team bricolage and subsequently, on team resilience. These studies further investigate whether task interdependence moderates the mediation of team bricolage for the relationship between team sensemaking and team resilience. In brief, these two studies conceptualize and test the relevance of team sensemaking, team bricolage and task interdependence for team resilience. Design/methodology/approach: A sample of 213 team members participated in the self-administered survey for Study 1. For Study 2, a second sample collected from 81 teams, elicited team-level data by consensus among team members. Findings: Findings show that team sensemaking as an antecedent has a significant and positive impact on team resilience. The results also show how and when the relationship between team sensemaking and team resilience is facilitated through an underlying mechanism of team bricolage in the presence of task interdependence among team members. This research improves the understanding about the relationship between team sensemaking and team resilience by examining the underlying mechanism and boundary condition under which the relationship is the strongest. Practical implications: These findings have important implications for human resource managers. In face of adverse events, team sensemaking plays a pivotal role as it can enable team members to have better situational awareness, communication and reflection. Team sensemaking can be further facilitated for improved team resilience by embedding bricolage and task interdependence components in the employee orientation, job description and training of potential and current employees. Originality/value: These findings demonstrate that in the wake of adverse events, team sensemaking can play a pivotal role as it enables team members to have better situational awareness, communication and reflection. For team resilience, the findings imply that team sensemaking can be further facilitated by team bricolage in the presence of task interdependence in work teams. Thus, managers of modern work teams and organizations can sensitize team members about these aspects through employee orientation, job description and on and off job training activities. © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Keywords

Author Keywords

Task interdependence Team bricolage Team resilience Team sensemaking Work teams of ICT sector

Index Keywords

Author Affiliations
Lahore School of Economics, Lahore, Pakistan
Funding & Acknowledgements
No funding information
References 10 References
1 Akgün, Ali Ekber, Antecedents and consequences of team sensemaking capability in product development projects, R and D Management, 42, 5, pp. 473-493, (2012)
2 Alliger, George M., Team resilience: How teams flourish under pressure, Organizational Dynamics, 44, 3, pp. 176-184, (2015)
3 Amaral, António Manuel, Identifying Useful Actions to Improve Team Resilience in Information Systems Projects, Procedia Computer Science, 64, pp. 1182-1189, (2015)
4 Athota, Vidya Sagar, Managing employee well-being and resilience for innovation: Evidence from knowledge-intensive service industries, Managing Employee Well-being and Resilience for Innovation: Evidence from Knowledge-intensive Service Industries, pp. 1-198, (2019)
5 Bachrach, Daniel G., Effects of task interdependence on the relationship between helping behavior and group performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 6, pp. 1396-1405, (2006)
6 Baker, Ted, Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage, Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 3, pp. 329-366, (2005)
7 Banks, George Christopher, Team coordination and organizational routines: bottoms up – and top down, Management Decision, 54, 5, pp. 1059-1072, (2016)
8 Baran, Benjamin E., Organizing ambiguity: A grounded theory of leadership and sensemaking within dangerous contexts, Military Psychology, 22, SUPPL. 1, pp. S42-S69, (2010)
9 Baron, Reuben M., The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research. Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 6, pp. 1173-1182, (1986)
10 Bechky, Beth A., Expecting the unexpected? How swat officers and film crews handle surprises, Academy of Management Journal, 54, 2, pp. 239-261, (2011)
Quick Actions
Full Text via DOI
Citation Metrics
46
Times Cited (Scopus)

References 10
Document Identifiers